While a few on the boards were supportive of a change in Year 2, I received countless emails to keep the roster size as is. Simply put, roster size is such an important issue with regards to team construction and dealing of draft picks in the beginning. It affects how you draft and how you build your initial team. We debated even putting this one on the survey because we didn't want to get everyone's hopes up, but we decided that IF we could get the players to shoulder a bit more of the responsibility for the future well being of the team, then we would take a look at the results. The majority of participants aren't willing to put their money behind such a huge change, so we'll have to table this for future discussion.
No changes to tanking, but please help us keep an eye out for it.
The majority has certainly spoken on this issue. We are considering this move but want to make sure the integrity of our Championship format is not compromised. We are in talks with our software provider to determine if they can modify the waivers to allow for just kicker pickups to eliminate the need for rostering a backup kicker.
Done deal. Consider this changed.
Hahahaha... Somebody from each league throw up a poll on your league page and take the pulse. Whatever the majority of each league decides is fine by us.
Pretty down the middle on this one as well so I don't think we'll be making any changes here. However, our team competitiveness clause requires you to field the best lineup possible at all times, so don't go cutting your only kicker in the middle of the season.
We are considering this as a mild compromise to those advocates of a larger roster, but in actuality it is only there for emergency purposes. I can sympathize with those who had 3+ players out on Injured reserve and had to waste a roster spot this year. Terrible!